Effing Govt
WHAT IS NEVER MENTIONED IN Mainstream Media like NST/TheStar/ Utusan/BH
are these facts....
Malaysian PerCapita Income USD 5000 VS Singaporean PerCapita Income USD 25000
马来西亚个人年收入指数5千美金对比 新国个人年指数2万5千美金
Further, The Star made a comparison of prices in Thailand , Singapore and Indonesia . For Thailand it is quoted at RM3.90/liter, however are they aware that in Thailand new cars are cheaper than Malaysia by RM10,000? They pay only one life time for their driving license? No renewal fee after that? Also that goes for road tax as well? And do TheStar also aware that you can drive all the way from Hadtyai to Bangkok on a six lane highway without paying any Tolls ??!! THESTAR
日前做出马来西亚燃油价格对比临近其他国家(如泰国、新
1. 泰国的汽车售价平均比大马的汽车销售价便宜1万马币。
2. 泰国车主一辈子只需缴付一次驾照以及路税而不必更新。
3. 从合艾开往曼谷有一条完全没有收费站的6道大道。
Where as here in Malaysia you have to pay yearly renewal for road tax, driving license and TOLLS, TOLLS, TOLLS!!!
反过来看大马,驾车人士必须更新驾照、路税,以及给不完
For Singapore how can you quote RM 5.20? Please quote in Singapore Dollars because they are earning in Sing Dollars. You might as well say Europeans are paying RM10/liter. RM5.20/liter = Sing $ 2.20/liter, still cheaper than Malaysia in view of fact that Singapore is not acrude oil exporter. Are you saying that you fill up petrol in Singapore by paying Ringgit?
针 对新国的状况,报章如何可以报导新国的燃油价为5.20
In economy, dollar to dollar must be compared as apple to apple. Not comparing like durian in M ' sia is much cheaper than durian in Japan !! Of course-lah, Japan is not durian producer!!! Comparing Malaysian durian with Thailand durian make more sense!!
在经济学论,一元对一元形同苹果对苹果,而不是拿马来西
For Indonesia we might say is cheaper there at RM2.07/liter but compare that to their level of income!
当然对于印尼则另当别论,虽然他们只售每公升2.07马
Now, let us compare the price with OIL PRODUCING countries:
现在让我们来跟同样是石油出产国的国家比较一下:
>>> UAE RM1.19/litre 阿拉伯酋长国 1.19马币
>>> Eygpt RM1.03/litre 埃及 1.03马币
>>> Bahrain RM0.87/litre 巴瑞 0.87马币
>>> Qatar RM0.68/litre 伽达 0.68马币
>>> Kuwait RM0.67/litre 科威特 0.67马币
>>> Saudi Arabia RM0.38/litre 沙地阿拉伯 0.38马币
>>> IranRM0.35/litre 伊朗 0.35马币
>>> Nigeria RM0.32/litre 尼日利亚 0.32马币
>>> Turkmenistan RM0.25/litre 突门尼斯坦 0.26马币
>>> Venezuela RM0.16/litre 维尼瑞拉 0.16马币
>>> MALAYSIA RM2.70/litre 马来西亚 2.70马币
RM 2.70!!!
Individual perspective: (*not mine*)
个人方面:
As of last month a Toyota Vios would ' cause a damage ' of about RM89,000. In the international market, a Toyota Vios is about USD 19,000
USD 19,000 = RM 62,700 (using the indicative rates of USD 1 = RM 3.30) That makes Malaysian Vios owners pay an extra RM 26,300.
上个月,丰田VIOS在大马售价8.9万。在国际市场,
This RM 26,300 should be cost of operations, profit and tax because the transportation costs have been factored in to the USD 19,000.
RM 26,300/ RM625 petrol rebate per year translates to a Vios being used for 42.08 years. I do understand that the RM 625 is a rebate given by the government, but it also means that one has to use the Vios for 42.08 years just to make back the amount paid in taxes for the usage of a foreign car. Would anyone use any kind of car for that long? Now with these numbers in front of us, does the subsidy sound like a subsidy or does it sound like a penalty? This just seems to be a heavy incrementin our daily cost of living as we are not only charged with high car taxes but also with a drastic increase in fuel price.
这 高达2.63万马币的差别,应该顺理成章的归类为处理、
With all the numbers listed out, I urge all Malaysians to join me in analyzing the situation further.
看着这些数字,我恳请大马的子民跟我一起分析其他的事情
Car taxation is government profit, fuel sales is Petronas ' (GLC) profit which also translates into government profit. The government may ridicule us Malaysians by saying look at the world market and fuelprice world wide. Please, we are Malaysians, we fought of the British, had an international port in the early centuries (Malacca), home to a racially mixed nation and WE ARE NOT STUPID!!!
汽车销售税务是国家的收入,可燃油的销售是国油(国营机
We know the international rates are above the USD 130/barrel. We understand the fact that the fuel prices are increasing worldwide and we also know that major scientist are still contradicting on why this phenomenon is happening. Some blame Bush and his plunders around the world and some blame climate change and there are others which say petroleum ' wells ' are getting scarce.
我们知道现在国际原油价格已经高于每桶美金130,我们
Again we go back to numbers to be more straight forward.
再一次,让我们回到数字(那会更直接)。
1 barrel = 159 liters x RM2.70/liter = RM 429 or USD 134。 On 1 hand, we are paying the full cost of 1 barrel of crude oil with RM2.70 per liter but on the other hand the crude oil only produces 46% of fuel.
1桶原油 =159公升;每公升2.7马币,那一桶则视429马币
Msia sells crude oil per barrel at USD130 buys back Fuel per barrel at USD134. And not forgetting, every barrel of fuel is produced with 2
barrels of crude oil.
马来西亚以美金130卖出1桶原油然后以美金134买进
>>> if 1 barrel crude oil = produce 46% fuel (or half of crude oil), therefore
>>> 2 barrel crude oil = approximately 1 barrel fuel
假设1桶原油可炼出46%的燃油(或者原油的一半),那
In other words, each time we sell 2 barrels of crude oil, equivalently we will buy back 1 barrel of fuel. Financially, Malaysia sell 2 barrelcrude oil @ USD 130/barrel = USD 260 = RM 858 then, Malaysia will buy back fuel @ USD 134/barrel = RM 442/barrel Thus, Malaysia earn net extra USD 126 = RM 416 for each 2 barrel of crude sold/exported vs imported 1 barrel of fuel !!!
>>> (USD 260-134 = USD 126 = RM416)
换句话说,每一次卖掉2桶原油便买回一桶燃油。以金钱来
So where this extra USD 126/barrel income is channeled to by Malaysian Govt????????
如此说来,那超出来的126美金跑哪去了?
Another analysis:
另外一个分析
>>> 1 barrel crude oil = 159 liters. 1桶原油 = 159公升
>>> 46-47% of a barrel of crude oil = fuel that we use in our vehicles. 46-47%的原油 = 我们所用的燃油
>>> 46% of 159 = 73.14 liters. 159公升的46% = 73.14公升
>>> @ RM 2.70/liter x 73.14 liter = RM197.48 of fuel per barrel of crude oil.
乘以每公升马币2.70,每一桶原油有价值马币197.
This is only 46% of the barrel, mind you. Using RM 3.30 = USD 1, we get that a barrel of crude oil produces USD 59.84 worth of petrol fuel (46%
of 1 barrel). USD 59.84 of USD 130/barrel turns out to be 46% of a barrel as well.
这只是那一桶原油中的46%。假设以1美金兑3.3马币
Another 54% = bitumen, kerosene, and natural gases and so many more. And this makes a balance of USD 70.16 that has not been accounted for.
剩余的54%包括了天然气、煤油、沥青及其他。而这些都
So this is where I got curious. Where is the subsidy if we are paying 46% of the price of a barrel of crude oil when the production of petrol/barrel of crude oil is still only 46%?
这便是我觉得好奇的地方:如果说我们正在付出了那原油4
In actual fact, we still pay for this as they are charged in the forms of fuel surcharge by airlines and road taxes for the building of road (because they use the tar/bitumen) and many more excuse charging us but let us just leave all that out of our calculations.
事实上,我们还在付与其他的费用,如航空公司的燃油费、
As far as I know, only the politicians who live in Putrajaya and come for their Parliament meetings in Kuala Lumpur (approximately 60+ km) are the ones to gain as they claim their fuel and toll charges from the money of the RAKYAT ' s TAX.
据我所知,只有那些住在布城并得远赴在首都国会参加会议
It is so disappointing to see this happen time and time again to the Malaysian public, where they are deceived by the propaganda held by the
politicians and the controls they have over the press.
这是一件非常遗憾的事情,因为周而复始地看见政府不断欺
Which stupid idiot economist equates rebates for rich or poor with the cc of the vehicles? An average office clerk may own a second hand 1300cc
proton Iswara costing $7,000 (rebate = $625) while the Datuk ' s children can own a fleet of 10 new cars of BMW, Audi and Volvo all less than
2000cc costing $2 millions and get a total rebate of $625 x 10 =$6,250! Wow what kind of economists we are keeping in Malaysia....wonder which phD certificate that they bought from...
有 哪个白痴经济学家会以汽车的cc来评定、计算回扣率?一
Misleading concept of Subsidy:
关于津贴的误导性
The word "subsidy" has been brandished by the BN government as if it has so generously helped the rakyat and in doing so incurred losses. This simple example will help to explain the fallacy:
“津贴”这个字眼已被国阵政府大事应用到让人感觉它的慷
>>> Example: 例子
Ahmad is a fisherman. He sells a fish to you at $10 which is below the market value of $15. Let ' s assume that he caught the fish from the abundance of the sea at little or no cost. Ahmad claims that since the market value of the fish is $15 and he sold you the fish for $10, he had
subsidised you $5 and therefore made a loss of $5.
阿末是一位渔夫,他以低于市价的马币10令吉卖一条鱼给
>>> Question : Did Ahmad actually make a profit of $10 or loss of $5 which he claimed is the subsidy?
请问:阿末究竟是赚了10块钱还是亏了他作为津贴的5块
>>> Answer:
Ahmad makes a profit of $10 which is the difference of the selling price ($10) minus the cost price ($0 since the fish was caught from the
abundance of the sea). There is no subsidy as claimed by Ahmad.
答案是:阿末(当然是)赚了10块钱。当中根本没有津贴
The BN government claims that it is a subsidy because the oil is kept and treated as somebody else ' s property (you know who). By right, the oil
belongs to all citizens of the country and the government is a trustee for the citizens. So as in the above simple example, the BN government
cannot claim that it has subsidised the citizen!
国阵政府说这是津贴,那是因为那些油都被藏起来,而且被
*courtesy from the fwd mail, origin of writer unknown*
Please nation, do something about this !! Thomas Yap !! call all your blogger friends !!


Recent Comments